"The bigger the smile, the sharper the knife. 48th Rule of Acquisition"


James Cameron trashes 'Hurt Locker' and 'Avatar' fans

In a recent EW interview, Cameron makes a few really harsh statements about crap and deserves to be called out.

Cameron tells Entertainment Weekly that Avatar fans who get super depressed because Pandora can't be a real place are lame and has some advice for them:

Quote:

If they really feel that they’re not getting enough of the wonders of the natural world in their life, then they should just go on a damn walk in the woods. Or go snorkeling.

And, despite the fact that ex-wife Kathryn Bigelow's action flick The Hurt Locker won her a Best Director Academy Award, he shows his slighted feelings by insisting,

Quote:

It would have been better in 3D... It wouldn’t have been hugely better in 3D, but I’m talking about a future when you don’t have to put “in 3D” on the movie poster anymore, the same way that you don’t put “in color” on posters anymore. Imagine that point in time, when 3D is just a natural, innate part of viewing.

It's important that Cameron finds a way to take the obvious, that his film was not as good as hers, and twist things so that, again, everything is all about him. His awesome super new amaza-3D technology he's going to invent will make not only his movies better, but Bigelow's better. Heck, ALL movies will be better once Cameron gets his hands on them. See, it's all about HIM. Not HER.

The journalist went ahead and pushed further, asking him, if he was 'surprised' when Bigelow won for The Hurt Locker instead of the mega pretentious children's film Avatar.

Quote:

Look, I’m the one who always wins the betting pool at our little Academy Awards party, so I knew in advance that it was a slam dunk for Kathryn to win director. It was David and Goliath. The Goliath had made more than a couple of billion dollars and Hurt Locker had made about what it cost to shoot, about $15 million. The Academy always likes to be the great equalizer.

Awww. The Academwy awwowed widdle miss Bigelow to win so tings would be mowe 'Equal'. I mean, no one can deny that his movie was a veritable 'Goliath' and made BILLIONS (is that true?) and hers made a measly NOTHING, and everyone felt bad for her.

You can read the rest of this embarassing interview here, and maybe Cameron and Sigourney Weaver can sit down and talk about how Bigelow's tits influenced everything.


Cameron, completely comfortable and not at all out of place, in Brazil with a native tribesperson that inspired his insipid tale of blue warriors.


Share
Offline
Joined: 08/14/2010
Posts: 1825

Here's my take. Cameron wasn't slamming his fans he was defending them. The galactically stupid interviewer ripped on them by calling them Avatards which is so juvenile it's ridiculous. He says he's a geek so therefore his fans must be geeks to appreciate his films. I'm a geek. I admit it. He was saying that if people did become depressed because Pandora didn't really exist, which he calls pure hyperbole, that it would be sad and they should take a look around at our own world. It's so true. There is absolutely nothing as breathtaking as going scuba diving but most people won't look around long enough to enjoy a garden.

He also isn't ripping on The Hurt Locker. He thinks that it might have been marginally better in 3D sure but his idea of 3D and everyone else's are completely different. Avatar is the only pure 3D experience out there right now. MOst other films are made into 3D in post-production and feature things jumping out of the screen like they did in the 80's. I don't think that's Cameron's vision of future 3D.

I think people like to take things he says out of context and blow it out of proportion. Like when he said he was "king of the world" at the Oscars. He was quoting his film, so what.

I'd say more but my ground beef is starting to burn.

__________________

This is not a dream... not a dream. We are using your brain's electrical system as a receiver. We are unable to transmit through conscious neural interference. You are receiving this broadcast as a dream. We are transmitting from the year one, nine, nine, nine. You are receiving this broadcast in order to alter the events you are seeing. Our technology has not developed a transmitter strong enough to reach your conscious state of awareness, but this is not a dream. You are seeing what is actually occurring for the purpose of causality violation.

0 votes
Cash Bailey's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/23/2010
Posts: 1741

James Cameron should really just, you know... be quiet.

Yes, you spent (and made) shameful amounts of money on your big blue cat cartoon. Don't pretend it was about anything more than that.

0 votes
Superheidi's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/30/2008
Posts: 14334

Quote:

I think people like to take things he says out of context and blow it out of proportion.

That's the definition of online entertainment journalism! Wink

__________________

I'm the owner and editor of PlanetFury. You can also find me at PlanetEtheria.com

0 votes
Offline
Joined: 08/14/2010
Posts: 1825

Superheidi wrote:
Quote:

I think people like to take things he says out of context and blow it out of proportion.

That's the definition of online entertainment journalism! Wink

Haha, yes but there are much bigger fish to fry aren't there? Or maybe I should say director's that suck a whole lot more. I just couldn't bring myself to rip on the guy who gave me Aliens, The Terminator and The Abyss.

__________________

This is not a dream... not a dream. We are using your brain's electrical system as a receiver. We are unable to transmit through conscious neural interference. You are receiving this broadcast as a dream. We are transmitting from the year one, nine, nine, nine. You are receiving this broadcast in order to alter the events you are seeing. Our technology has not developed a transmitter strong enough to reach your conscious state of awareness, but this is not a dream. You are seeing what is actually occurring for the purpose of causality violation.

0 votes
Julie Kerr's picture
Offline
Joined: 03/18/2010
Posts: 148

He's a good director as far as talent and but yeah, full of himself. I got bored watching Avatar. But, my friend took me to see it twice and paid for me twice just cause he wanted to see it so bad, so I can't complain too much.

Avatar was Ferngully mixed with Dances with Wolves. 3D is awesome and everything. You can't just give someone a best picture Oscar just because the 3D was super cool. But, I do wonder why the film Precious didn't get pushed as Best Picture. Honestly, Precious was way more compelling than Avatar. I haven't seen Hurt Locker to comment on it.

__________________

Director,
Geek Loves Punk

0 votes
Offline
Joined: 08/14/2010
Posts: 1825

Julie Kerr wrote:

He's a good director as far as talent and but yeah, full of himself. I got bored watching Avatar. But, my friend took me to see it twice and paid for me twice just cause he wanted to see it so bad, so I can't complain too much.

Avatar was Ferngully mixed with Dances with Wolves. 3D is awesome and everything. You can't just give someone a best picture Oscar just because the 3D was super cool. But, I do wonder why the film Precious didn't get pushed as Best Picture. Honestly, Precious was way more compelling than Avatar. I haven't seen Hurt Locker to comment on it.

I haven't seen Precious 'cause it looked like a big downer but Hurt Locker is excellent. Black Hawk Down is a great modern warfare film and The Hurt Locker is even better. War films have always done very well with the Academy. I also thought it was pretty fitting that an independent film beat out the most expensive film ever made because generally speaking the independents are blowing away Hollywood these days.

I got into indie films fairly heavily 15 or so years ago and have never seen the quality that I've been seeing over the last several years. Most of the great foreign films that have come out lately have been independent films too. If it wasn't for them there wouldn't be a whole lot to watch as far as horror films go.

I think that's a pretty good indication of the fact that there is such a wide, empty gulf between big and no budget today. There isn't much in between anymore.

__________________

This is not a dream... not a dream. We are using your brain's electrical system as a receiver. We are unable to transmit through conscious neural interference. You are receiving this broadcast as a dream. We are transmitting from the year one, nine, nine, nine. You are receiving this broadcast in order to alter the events you are seeing. Our technology has not developed a transmitter strong enough to reach your conscious state of awareness, but this is not a dream. You are seeing what is actually occurring for the purpose of causality violation.

0 votes
Tristan Sinns's picture
Offline
Joined: 11/26/2008
Posts: 3602

Julie Kerr wrote:

But, I do wonder why the film Precious didn't get pushed as Best Picture.

I had to check as I was surprised it hadn't gotten a nomination for best picture, and found it had:

http://oscar.go.com/nominations/nominees?cid=10_oscars_landingCallout_no...

Thankfully! I haven't seen Precious but I've heard enough about it to be pretty certain it did at least deserved a nomination; especially since Avatar and Inglorious Bastards got nominated. Inglorious Bastards! I loved that movie but it just seems "wrong" to think of Inglorious Bastards winning.

__________________

I made this website. I'm sorry.

0 votes
Offline
Joined: 08/17/2010
Posts: 1

Cameron has repeatedly praised The Hurt Locker: http://incontention.com/?p=10657

He encouraged Bigelow to direct it when she asked him to help her choose between projects. He didn't trash the film at all, but was simply answering the "would X have been better in 3-D" question the same way he nearly always does, because he believes virtually everything (except for something like his Hiroshima project) should be filmed in 3-D. It's no different from Scorsese saying he thinks Precious would have been better in 3-D.

Nor did Cameron trash Avatar fans. As RAN said, he objected to the interviewer calling them "Avatards," said the whole story is hyperbole and asked if he was saying to the fans, "Get a life" he responded: "no. I think you have to be respectful of fans, because, let’s face it, I’m a geek. If I’m geek enough to put all the detail in the machines and technology and ecosystems in my movies, then the people who value that are going to be just as geeky as me. I can’t dis them."

0 votes
Superheidi's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/30/2008
Posts: 14334

It's amazing to see how many people are rushing to his defense.

Personally, I don't like anything he's made after 1991.

__________________

I'm the owner and editor of PlanetFury. You can also find me at PlanetEtheria.com

0 votes
Tristan Sinns's picture
Offline
Joined: 11/26/2008
Posts: 3602

Superheidi wrote:

Personally, I don't like anything he's made after 1991.

I had to go IMDB and take the 1991 test, and: you're right! Year 1991 was where the line was drawn. I thought True Lies was pretty mediocre. Titantic was blecht, and we already know how I feel about Avatar.

__________________

I made this website. I'm sorry.

0 votes
Offline
Joined: 08/14/2010
Posts: 1825

Face it Tristan. You just don't like action movies. It's ok, admitting it is the first step. Tongue

I love True Lies and since I've been obsessed with the Titanic since I was a kid the movie just blows my mind with how historically accurate it is. Such attention to detail. I don't have to mention how I feel about Avatar. Happy

Ok guys now write an article ripping on Ridley Scott.

Haha, I'm kidding of course, highly opinionated people make life interesting.

__________________

This is not a dream... not a dream. We are using your brain's electrical system as a receiver. We are unable to transmit through conscious neural interference. You are receiving this broadcast as a dream. We are transmitting from the year one, nine, nine, nine. You are receiving this broadcast in order to alter the events you are seeing. Our technology has not developed a transmitter strong enough to reach your conscious state of awareness, but this is not a dream. You are seeing what is actually occurring for the purpose of causality violation.

0 votes
Tristan Sinns's picture
Offline
Joined: 11/26/2008
Posts: 3602

Hey now, we both agreed Inception was awesome! That last act was about as action-ee as a movie can get. Grin

__________________

I made this website. I'm sorry.

0 votes
Chris McMillan's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/28/2009
Posts: 1325

I have to admit liking Titanic, though I wish I could go back in time and stop Celine Dion from singing that god-awful song. The story was silly, but engaging enough. And just as I was getting bored with it, the iceberg came into view and the film turned into a visually stunning action film. And speaking of visually stunning, let's not forget Kate Winslet ( :love: Yum!).

True Lies had an interesting first half, but the final act (right after the nuke goes off) was just too over the top and cartoonish to mesh with the rest of the film. Too bad, as Arnold and Jamie Lee really worked off each other well and the story of an action hero playing a boring husband, which turns off his wife, was fun.

As I've said, Avatar is visually stunning, but the script felt like it was written by a sixth grader. You could say the same about The Abyss, as the love story is kind of silly. As was the romance in The Terminator and the mother-daughter bit in Aliens.

But back then, Cameron seemed more concerned about characters then expanding the abilities of visual effects. That focus helped make up for his deficiency as a writer. But now, his movies are more vehicles for his effects work than actual stories. It's really a shame, because the man is capable of telling an engaging story.

__________________

Visit my blog: http://shadowoverportland.blogspot.com/

0 votes
Julie Kerr's picture
Offline
Joined: 03/18/2010
Posts: 148

I thought it was amazing that the independent film beat out the blockbuster. It does seem like Hurt Locker tells a good story. Yay, independent films!!!

__________________

Director,
Geek Loves Punk

0 votes
Offline
Joined: 08/14/2010
Posts: 1825

I think the characters and dialogue in The Abyss are fantastic. I watch the movie once every couple of months. The scene where Lindsey drowns in the submersible and Virgil swims her back to the platform and then resuscitates her chokes me up every single time. IMO, it's one of the most gut wrenching moments in film period. Ed Harris and Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio gave incredible performances. Cameron almost drown making that one. He almost drown making Titanic too. He just won't stay out of the water though. He just spent his birthday in the Mir on the bottom of the worlds deepest lake.

__________________

This is not a dream... not a dream. We are using your brain's electrical system as a receiver. We are unable to transmit through conscious neural interference. You are receiving this broadcast as a dream. We are transmitting from the year one, nine, nine, nine. You are receiving this broadcast in order to alter the events you are seeing. Our technology has not developed a transmitter strong enough to reach your conscious state of awareness, but this is not a dream. You are seeing what is actually occurring for the purpose of causality violation.

0 votes
Cash Bailey's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/23/2010
Posts: 1741

RAN wrote:

I think the characters and dialogue in The Abyss are fantastic. I watch the movie once every couple of months. The scene where Lindsey drowns in the submersible and Virgil swims her back to the platform and then resuscitates her chokes me up every single time. IMO, it's one of the most gut wrenching moments in film period. Ed Harris and Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio gave incredible performances.

I totally agree. Overall THE ABYSS is an incredible movie.

0 votes
Tristan Sinns's picture
Offline
Joined: 11/26/2008
Posts: 3602

Cash Bailey wrote:
RAN wrote:

I think the characters and dialogue in The Abyss are fantastic. I watch the movie once every couple of months. The scene where Lindsey drowns in the submersible and Virgil swims her back to the platform and then resuscitates her chokes me up every single time. IMO, it's one of the most gut wrenching moments in film period. Ed Harris and Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio gave incredible performances.

I totally agree. Overall THE ABYSS is an incredible movie.

Third'd. It's an awesome film. That resuscitating scenes has always been incredible for the "real time" pacing of it all - that he didn't let her "wake up" right away was just awesome.

I haven't seen it in a few years and am suddenly wondering how good it looks on Blu-ray. Grin

__________________

I made this website. I'm sorry.

0 votes
Offline
Joined: 08/14/2010
Posts: 1825

Tristan Sinns wrote:
Cash Bailey wrote:
RAN wrote:

I think the characters and dialogue in The Abyss are fantastic. I watch the movie once every couple of months. The scene where Lindsey drowns in the submersible and Virgil swims her back to the platform and then resuscitates her chokes me up every single time. IMO, it's one of the most gut wrenching moments in film period. Ed Harris and Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio gave incredible performances.

I totally agree. Overall THE ABYSS is an incredible movie.

Third'd. It's an awesome film. That resuscitating scenes has always been incredible for the "real time" pacing of it all - that he didn't let her "wake up" right away was just awesome.

I haven't seen it in a few years and am suddenly wondering how good it looks on Blu-ray. Grin

Hmm, I wonder how good it looks on Blu-ray too. I can tell you Avatar is jaw dropping. Happy

There's also Michael Biehn. What an intense performance from him. He's had a lot of great roles in great films but Coffey is my favorite.

That's it! I'm watching this today.

__________________

This is not a dream... not a dream. We are using your brain's electrical system as a receiver. We are unable to transmit through conscious neural interference. You are receiving this broadcast as a dream. We are transmitting from the year one, nine, nine, nine. You are receiving this broadcast in order to alter the events you are seeing. Our technology has not developed a transmitter strong enough to reach your conscious state of awareness, but this is not a dream. You are seeing what is actually occurring for the purpose of causality violation.

0 votes
Private J.V. Vasquez's picture
Offline
Joined: 01/09/2005
Posts: 1851

LMAO *dies on floor laughing*

He did not just say Hurt Locker would of been better if it was in 3-D was he being serious!? Because if he was he is an idiot, oh yeah we are going to make a war-drama and totally take the seriousness out of it and put 3-D in it. Great idea James!

IS he on crack? I swear to god he is such a sore loser, I told you he was a sore loser I bet that it hurt his feelings his ex-wife stole his thunder.

The only things I ever liked about James Cameron was Terminator 1 & 2, Aliens, Strange Days which he wrote and Kathrine directed coincidentally enough. Everything else sucks donkey balls.

Fuck him for saying the only reason she got an oscar because her movie didn't make as much money so they felt sorry for her. No James, the real reason was she made a good movie and you just had blue smurfs running around which was a rip on Dancing with wolves so sorry no prize for you.

I seriously lol at him saying Hurt Locker would of been better in 3D.

__________________

"I hurt" - Karen Cooper "Night Of The Living Dead"

0 votes
Chris McMillan's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/28/2009
Posts: 1325

Perhaps I should clarify my stance on The Abyss, which is a fucking great movie, especially the extended edition (one of the first DVDs I bought). While I feel the romance between Ed Harris and Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio feels rather childish at times, the film packs a massive punch. But that's because Cameron took time to develop the characters, not just try to make special effects history.

So, how can a movie based on a juvenile love story keep one's interest? By making it about a group of people, not blue cardboard cutouts. I felt for every character, even Coffey, and that says a lot when you feel sorry for the death of the "villain".

Just wanted to clarify my earlier post, in case anyone thought I didn't like The Abyss. It's a great movie, and why I hope Cameron gets his head straight and starts making movies like that again.

__________________

Visit my blog: http://shadowoverportland.blogspot.com/

0 votes
Tristan Sinns's picture
Offline
Joined: 11/26/2008
Posts: 3602

Bigmac wrote:

Just wanted to clarify my earlier post, in case anyone thought I didn't like The Abyss. It's a great movie, and why I hope Cameron gets his head straight and starts making movies like that again.

I wish he would too. But I don't know - it seems like these directors get older and lose whatever edge they had and just start making pewp. Look at Lucas and Spielberg for example. Were the last three Star Wars films, or the last Indiana Jones movie, even anywhere on par with the originals? Nope!

__________________

I made this website. I'm sorry.

0 votes

User login

Cosplay Costumes

Enter your email address:

Get Planet Fury news in your inbox!

  • Planet Fury Privacy Policy


Graphics created by ArtSkull
Pretty-Scary.net, FanGirlTastic, and Planet Fury © Copyright 2004-2012 Heidi Honeycutt
Site layout, design, and code awesomeness by Tristan Sinns