"After you've exploited someone, it never hurts to thank them. That way, it's easier to exploit them next time. 299th Rule of Acquisition "


Halloween 2 (1981)

Directed by: Rick Rosenthal
Written by; John Carpenter, Debra Hill
Starring: Jamie Lee Curtis, Donald Pleasence, Lance Guest, Pamela Susan Shoop, Charles Cyphers

This review was originally slated for last October. However, just days after viewing the Halloween 2 30th Anniversary Edition disc, the Moustapha Akkad credit controversy sort of eclipsed the release. If you’ll recall, when the much-anticipated Blu-ray debuted last fall, fans noticed the opening credits had been altered. Universal had replaced Akkad’s “presents” credit with a Universal/MCA card.

The late Akkad, an executive producer on all eight original Halloween films, was the key person responsible for the longevity of the series. Fans were outraged and started an online petition to encourage Universal to replace the original credit. The studio eventually acquiesced and gave fans the opportunity to exchange their altered DVD for a copy with the original credit. Since the replacement copies have finally started to make their way to the fans, I thought it would be a good time to revisit the Blu-ray release.

Universal has never been very supportive of the two Halloween films they helped finance. Through the years, they have issued both Halloween 2 and Halloween 3: Season of the Witch in several bare-bones releases (and one double-disc) designed strictly for the bargain bin. This has always bothered fans of the series, who have seen several iterations of the later, pre-Dimension sequels given spiffy special edition issues. Anchor Bay has had the rights to the original classic and the two Trancas International follow-ups (Parts 4 & 5) for years. Whatever your opinion of the later films, there is no denying that Anchor Bay went the extra mile to honor them with commentaries, interviews and a plethora of other extras.

Universal has never bothered to cater to the huge fan base for the horror series, which explains, in part, their insensitivity to the late Akkad. For years they have simply treated their Halloween films as any other “catalogue title,” reissuing them every few years for quick October cash grabs. That changed last October when Universal finally released a high-definition version of Halloween 2, the 1981 sequel to John Carpenter’s landmark horror film. While hardly a “special edition,” it’s a respectable release and a must for fans of the series.

The Moustapha Akkad presentation of Halloween 2 picks up directly where the original ends. Dr. Loomis (Donald Pleasence) shoots boogeyman Michael Myers (Nick Castle) six times, sending him over a balcony and onto the lawn of the Doyle house. Of course, everybody knows that you "can’t kill the boogeyman" and Myers’ body is nowhere to be found. Intrepid “final girl” Laurie Strode (Jamie Lee Curtis) is taken by ambulance to Haddonfield Memorial Hospital to tend to her wounds while Loomis and Sheriff Brackett (Charles Cyphers) wander the streets of Haddonfield attempting to find The Shape.

Throughout his original rampage, Michael’s motives were seemingly tied to the anniversary of his murder of his sister Judith fifteen years prior. After returning to the scene of the crime, he fixated on a teenager (Laurie) who reminded him of Judith, compelling him to repeat the crime again. His efficient trail of death was either tied to survival or his compulsion to relive the past. A Phelp’s Garage mechanic, two dogs and three horny teens were either slashed or strangled, and sometimes both. By Halloween 2, our boogeyman (now played by stunt man Dick Warlock) appears less focused and much more angry.

Maybe it was the knitting needle in the neck, the hanger in the eye, the butcher knife in the chest, the six close-range bullets to his body and two-story fall to the ground that soured his patient, methodical approach. Whatever the cause, poor Alice (Anne Bruner), a random teen alone in her home, is the first unfortunate victim of the angrier, less subtle Myers. Alice’s only sin? Leaving the front door unlocked. Myers may have returned, but he couldn’t have wandered farther from Orange Grove Ave.

The rest of Halloween 2 focuses on Loomis’ attempts at finding Myers — and Myers’ attempts at killing Laurie. While Loomis gathers clues indicating a nonsensical (and unnecessary) motive for his former patient, the incompetent staff at Haddonfield Memorial are systematically killed by Myers in several mean and equally nonsensical ways. The creepy cat-and-mouse games from the original have been replaced by Friday the 13th-style murder set pieces. What is most frustrating with this film, again scripted by Carpenter and Debra Hill, is that there is no true protagonist.

Jamie Lee Curtis’ Laurie is drugged and bedridden for most of the running time. The heroic babysitter from the original is relegated to the sidelines while Loomis is left to search dental records and wax philosophic on evil and Samhain. Hard to believe that Carpenter and Hill would choose to pursue such a limited and redundant narrative. It’s a slick yet depressing coda to a classic film that surely deserved better.

Director Rick Rosenthal (Halloween: Resurrection) does a serviceable job with the slight material he was given. He gets some solid performances from Pleasence, Cyphers and Lance Guest as concerned paramedic Jimmy. Nancy Stephens makes a welcome return as the cynical Marion and Gloria Gifford is a strong presence as head nurse Mrs. Alves (the lone authority figure at Haddonfield Memorial). Curtis, who did the sequel out of loyalty to Carpenter and Hill, is suitably worried and anxious in her extended victim role. Thankfully, she was able to reconcile the somnambulant turn of her character several years later in the compelling Halloween: H20.

Rosenthal’s film looks and feels very much like the original, thanks to returning cinematographer Dean Cundey. The first moments after the opening credits, with Myers’ POV through the back alleys of Haddonfield, contain a mischievous energy missing from the rest of the film. These brief shots cleverly mirror the beginning of the original and promise a movie that is far more inventive than what follows. Much of Halloween 2 works on a very primal level.

As a Halloween sequel, it’s all trick, but as a mindless slasher film it’s a digestible treat. It’s helped greatly by the kinetic score, an electronic revamp of Carpenter’s iconic original soundtrack. The extended, entirely expected stalking sequence between Myers and Laurie is shot and edited with a modicum of energy. But the slow pace of Warlock's Myers is often unintentionally funny. And Laurie narrowly escaping by jumping into a slow-moving elevator is far removed from the nail-biting confrontations orchestrated in the first film.

The most interesting aspect of this DVD release is the inclusion of Terror in the Aisles, an uneven horror film compilation from 1984. Narrated by Donald Pleasence and Nancy Allen (Carrie) the film showcases several scenes from famous (and not-so-famous) horror films. While it contains some clever editing, the movie is hampered by a finite selection of titles, several of which are not even actual horror flicks. Extended scenes from Nighthawks and Vice Squad will leave audiences more confused than entertained. However it’s the first DVD release of this obscure favorite, so the inclusion is definitely a bonus.

Halloween 2 is presented in its proper 2.35:1 aspect ratio with a beautiful high-definition print. The film has never looked this great; Akkad would be proud. The bonus features, in addition to Terror on the Aisles, are several deleted scenes and the alternate (and superior) television ending.



Rating: (2 out of 5):

Share
Cash Bailey's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/23/2010
Posts: 1921

I remember hearing years ago that Rosenthal actually recorded a commentary but it was so bad they scrapped it from the release.

Whether Rosenthal trashed the Akkad's or whether he was just an unlikable prick, I don't know.

Thomwade's picture
Offline
Joined: 02/26/2010
Posts: 1311

I just never understood how a guy could get shot in both eyes and not have his brains splattered on the wall.

Superheidi's picture
Offline
Joined: 09/29/2004
Posts: 14914

Brilliant write-up, Bradley! I must shamefully confess, however, that I am a big fan of part II and enjoy its hospital set pieces more than the slow, artistic, spooky original.

*ducks to avoid rotten fruit*

__________________

"Another great thing about being 70,000 light years away from the nearest Starfleet vessel is that once we finally get back to Earth, we can makeup bullshit stories. Off the top of my head: 'We met Amelia Earhart,' 'We singlehandedly eliminated most of the Borg fleet' or 'Paris and I turned into giant pink lizards and mated.'"

I'm the owner and editor of PlanetFury. You can also find me at PlanetEtheria.com

Tristan Sinns's picture
Offline
Joined: 11/26/2008
Posts: 3884

Superheidi wrote:

Brilliant write-up, Bradley! I must shamefully confess, however, that I am a big fan of part II and enjoy its hospital set pieces more than the slow, artistic, spooky original.

I think the original only seems slow to modern audiences who have been overly exposed to hyper frenetic Michael Bay type films.

Not that you're one of those!

__________________

I made this website. I'm sorry.

Thomwade's picture
Offline
Joined: 02/26/2010
Posts: 1311

I think the original is better...but every Halloween, I watch 1& 2 together. I enjoy 2 flaws and all.

Bradley Harding's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/09/2011
Posts: 92

I know that I'm in the minority, but I always felt that Halloween was Laurie's story. I was never very satisfied by any of the sequels until H20. Each successive film attempted to give Myers myriad reasons to kill people. I liked the ambiguity of the original. A murderous boogeyman without a clear motive is very scary to me. But I will admit to watching every chapter. I've even seen the wretched Part 5 more times than I am willing to admit.

__________________

"Well kiddo, I thought you outgrew superstition."

Theron's picture
Offline
Joined: 10/25/2006
Posts: 2524

Bradley Harding wrote:

I know that I'm in the minority, but I always felt that Halloween was Laurie's story.

You nailed it. The first was really about Laurie, not Michael. And that's what differentiates it from Zombie's remake. His Halloween is Michael's story. And that's why I didn't hate it. I think he took a smart approach by trying not to recreate the original. He gave Michael a film in which Laurie was a co-star — the exact opposite of the Carpenter classic.

__________________

A mind is like a parachute. It doesn't work if it's not open.

Bradley Harding's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/09/2011
Posts: 92

I couldn't bring myself to watch the Rob Zombie film. That looked like a real bad time.

__________________

"Well kiddo, I thought you outgrew superstition."

Cash Bailey's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/23/2010
Posts: 1921

Bradley Harding wrote:

I couldn't bring myself to watch the Rob Zombie film. That looked like a real bad time.

You are wise. It sucked ass.

Theron's picture
Offline
Joined: 10/25/2006
Posts: 2524

Cash Bailey wrote:
Bradley Harding wrote:

I couldn't bring myself to watch the Rob Zombie film. That looked like a real bad time.

You are wise. It sucked ass.

I don't think it did. But I'm obviously in the minority here.

__________________

A mind is like a parachute. It doesn't work if it's not open.

Chris McMillan's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/28/2009
Posts: 1392

Theron wrote:
Cash Bailey wrote:
Bradley Harding wrote:

I couldn't bring myself to watch the Rob Zombie film. That looked like a real bad time.

You are wise. It sucked ass.

I don't think it did. But I'm obviously in the minority here.

'Fraid you are... :-D

It's not that I think Zombie is a bad director. But by making Micheal the star of his films, Zombie the writer made him less scary. Allowing the audience to relate to the monster works well with a story like Frankenstein, but not for Micheal Meyers. At least that's why the latter films in the series, including the Zombie remakes, didn't work for me.

__________________

Visit my blog: http://shadowoverportland.blogspot.com/

Theron's picture
Offline
Joined: 10/25/2006
Posts: 2524

Chris McMillan wrote:
Theron wrote:
Cash Bailey wrote:
Bradley Harding wrote:

I couldn't bring myself to watch the Rob Zombie film. That looked like a real bad time.

You are wise. It sucked ass.

I don't think it did. But I'm obviously in the minority here.

'Fraid you are... :-D

It's not that I think Zombie is a bad director. But by making Micheal the star of his films, Zombie the writer made him less scary. Allowing the audience to relate to the monster works well with a story like Frankenstein, but not for Micheal Meyers. At least that's why the latter films in the series, including the Zombie remakes, didn't work for me.

But I still think it was a good way to go. Halloween was a classic, singular film. You can't really remake a movie like that. So much of its power was due to Carpenter's sensibilities: the shot choices, the camera work, the editing. So if a movie like that is going to be remade (and it was, like it or not), the filmmakers have to go in a completely different direction. (This is why I fear the upcoming spate of Hitchcock remakes have little chance of succeeding.)

Now I'll agree absolutely that Zombie' second Halloween movie is total misfire, but I liked the first one.

__________________

A mind is like a parachute. It doesn't work if it's not open.

Superheidi's picture
Offline
Joined: 09/29/2004
Posts: 14914

What I didn't like about Zombie's versions was the dialogue and the strange plot choices (i.e. in part 1, why does Michael stop to save a girl from being raped before escaping the asylum? he's a sociopath!) and the white-trash-ening up of it all. I thought it looked really good and I really enjoy his casting.

Seriously, Zombie is a wealthy New England Jew. Why is he obsessed with poor white southern folks and trailer trash? Are they, like, mystical unknown creatures to him because he's never seen them in real life?

__________________

"Another great thing about being 70,000 light years away from the nearest Starfleet vessel is that once we finally get back to Earth, we can makeup bullshit stories. Off the top of my head: 'We met Amelia Earhart,' 'We singlehandedly eliminated most of the Borg fleet' or 'Paris and I turned into giant pink lizards and mated.'"

I'm the owner and editor of PlanetFury. You can also find me at PlanetEtheria.com

Superheidi's picture
Offline
Joined: 09/29/2004
Posts: 14914

And without Rob Zombie's Halloween, what happens at 6:45 in this video would never have otherwise happened, and for that alone I am eternally grateful:

__________________

"Another great thing about being 70,000 light years away from the nearest Starfleet vessel is that once we finally get back to Earth, we can makeup bullshit stories. Off the top of my head: 'We met Amelia Earhart,' 'We singlehandedly eliminated most of the Borg fleet' or 'Paris and I turned into giant pink lizards and mated.'"

I'm the owner and editor of PlanetFury. You can also find me at PlanetEtheria.com

Thomwade's picture
Offline
Joined: 02/26/2010
Posts: 1311

I was okay with Zombie's Halloween remake as long as I saw it as ROB ZOMBIE'S Halloween. It is like Kubrick's The Shining. Great Kubrick horror film. Terrible adaption.

Carpenter's is a classic...Zombie made a grindhouse film called Halloween.

But my thing with giving Michael a backstory is...the one in the first film was great. Michael came from a typical family without an abusive parent and a generally shitty environment picked on at school...etc.

What made Michael scary was there seemed to be no reason in his background...he was not a victim who struck out. He just killed. Because something compelled him to.

I really liked Brad Douriff in the film. I did not care for watching Danielle Harris having to get thrown around and stabbed topless. It seemed really sleazy to make sure she was topless before the violent attack.

Thomwade's picture
Offline
Joined: 02/26/2010
Posts: 1311

Superheidi wrote:

What I didn't like about Zombie's versions was the dialogue and the strange plot choices (i.e. in part 1, why does Michael stop to save a girl from being raped before escaping the asylum? he's a sociopath!)

And then kills the only person in the asylum to treat him kindly. He had reason to let that janitor go...even as a sociopath. He had no connection to the rape victim.

Thomas Duke's picture
Offline
Joined: 02/02/2011
Posts: 697

I have the original Halloween II blu-ray, and I heard that the sound is compressed, but that maybe it wasn't on the re-release. I didn't care enough to try and get a replacement though.

Also, I'm surprised they got Terror in the Aisles licensed. It is made of film clips and not just trailer clips, and I don't know that Universal has the rights to all of them anymore. It is my understanding that they would have had to clear the individual clips again to release it on blu-ray (even though they released it on VHS), so maybe they did that or got around it some how (maybe because it's an extra and not a feature helped that out). Even so, it wouldn't surprise me if the Blu-ray eventually went out of print because of a clip rights hang-up with Terror in the Aisles.

__________________

Blog: Cinema Gonzo

cobane's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/08/2012
Posts: 89

Watching Halloween without watching Halloween II is like watching Hellraiser without following it up with Hellbound, or Yojimbo without Sanjuro. As far as I'm concerned they're joined at the hip.

And Thomwade is correct, Zombie's interpretation of Michael is atrocious at best. Michael was born evil -- that was the entire point. Trying to explain his behavior by focusing on a childhood gone awry puts it in the neighborhood of normalcy. He puts on that mask not because he's disturbed by childhood trauma but because it scares the crap out of his victims.

The Good Son with Macaulay Culkin serves as a much better take on Michael's early years.

Tristan Sinns's picture
Offline
Joined: 11/26/2008
Posts: 3884

cobane wrote:

And Thomwade is correct, Zombie's interpretation of Michael is atrocious at best. Michael was born evil -- that was the entire point. Trying to explain his behavior by focusing on a childhood gone awry puts it in the neighborhood of normalcy. He puts on that mask not because he's disturbed by childhood trauma but because it scares the crap out of his victims.

Exactly. That's what was all so perfect and scary - the idea of real, unbridled evil. The notion that "Oh, he's just angry because of his horrible childhood" is just awful. Plain

__________________

I made this website. I'm sorry.

User login

The Los Angeles film school
Cosplay Costumes

Enter your email address:

Get Planet Fury news in your inbox!

  • Planet Fury Privacy Policy


Graphics created by ArtSkull
Pretty-Scary.net, FanGirlTastic, and Planet Fury © Copyright 2004-2012 Heidi Honeycutt
Site layout, design, and code awesomeness by Tristan Sinns