"A lot of people don't want to make their own decisions. They're too scared. It's much easier to be told what to do. - Marilyn Manson"


Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance (2012)

Directed by: Mark Neveldine, Brian Taylor
Written by: Scott Gimple, Seth Hoffman, David S. Goyer
Cast: Nicolas Cage, Fergus Riordan, Ciaran Hinds, Violante Placido, Idris Elba, Christopher Lambert, Johnny Whitworth

That damned Satan is at it again.

One of the many bad "its" he's up to is premarital sex; Satan (Ciaran Hinds) manages to enchant, date and somehow seduce the mortal Nadya (Violante Placido). Or, maybe he violently rapes her. I'm not really sure. All I know is that they had sex. The expositional dialogue of this film is of the variety that lends one to stare into space, thinking of something other than the film, and I admit I missed exactly how it is they slept together. But, the main point is this: Some nine months later, Nadya gives birth to Satan's child on earth.

Somehow, Nadya has managed to raise the child to about 10 years, all without the help (or child support payments, presumably) of that nasty Satan. Dad has a dark ritual to attend to, however, and so wants his son back. The devil — for some not entirely explained reason — is a little weak in mortal form on earth, and so he sends a number of nasty bad thugs to go collect the child instead of doing it himself.

Johnny Blaze (Nicholas Cage) gets pulled into this mix through bumbling serendipity and ends up in the role of the child's protector. Ghost Rider is the "good" terminator looking to fight off the "evil" terminators that the devil sends after them. Predictably, he ends up forming a weakly shown bond with the young boy and becomes emotionally invested in the safety of the child as well as his mom.

Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance is, as one might imagine, a big silly pile of crap; however, it is one of those big silly piles of crap that has some value in just being ridiculous. Much of this comes from the frenzied wonder that is Nicholas Cage, who certainly does have some Bad Lieutenant moments of hysterical craziness, but it is also just due to the subject matter itself. The flaming skull of its titular character was never a very subtle thing.

It does seem like this installment is a little less filled with corny punchlines than the first film; the original actually had "bonehead" jokes sewn throughout it. But that doesn't mean Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance takes things entirely seriously, and this is a good thing. Bad guy Ray Carrigan (Johnny Whitworth) delivers the best gag of the film when Satan turns him into an undead monster with the unholy power to rapidly decay anything he touches. Even an undead monster gets hungry, and so Ray sticks his hand into an abandoned brown bag lunch he finds to get something to eat. The sandwich he pulls out immediately rots in his hand and becomes inedible; he throws it to the ground. He pulls an apple out of the bag, and it withers and rots from his evil power and is also wasted. He tries again, and this time pulls out a Hostess Twinkie. It doesn't rot. It stays perfect. He eats the Twinkie and is happy.

Clever moments like this are actually pretty rare for the film, and the great bulk of the plot is abysmal nonsense. I never understood why Satan had such a hard time reeling in a 10-year-old boy. I got the bit about how Satan's powers are supposed to be a little diminished while he's in human form but, for crying out loud, he's still Satan and we're just talking about a 10-year-old. Further than that, let's all recall that Ghost Rider was created by Satan, when the mortal Johnny Blaze made a pact with the Devil to save his father's life. Satan injected him with an evil entity in order to give the man super skull-based powers and to use him to collect the souls of the damned. But why is it that Ghost Rider can now directly battle against his master? Satan made the damned thing, and we're supposed to believe that Ghost Rider can not only directly fight the Devil, but might even win. Why would Satan do that? Is the greatest evil the universe ever imagined such a blithering idiot as to blindly create a power that can not only disobey him, but might even destroy his master plan? The real Satan should sue.

I hadn't really followed this film prior to seeing it, so I was actually a little surprised to see Highlander Christopher Lambert appear. Lambert plays Methodius, a tattooed monk belonging to some secret order that is somehow involved with all of this foolishness. If seeing Lambert was my first surprise, my second was in that Lambert did not have a sword. I thought Christopher Lambert had some sort of contractual deal with someone — maybe Satan — that he had to appear with a sword in every single movie he's in. "Wow!" I thought. "He doesn't have a sword!" About 10 minutes later, things go bad and suddenly Lambert the monk pulls out a sword and starts swinging it around. I guess Lambert's "Sword Contract" remains intact.

There was one line in the film that was particularly lame and deserves special note. At the beginning of the film, Cage delivers some rambling narration explaining the nature of Ghost Rider and makes the claim that he may just kill anyone for any given sin, including those who may make "illegal downloads." The studios obviously seeded the film with this insipid, stupid little line in order to express their financially fueled opinion on this hot button item. It was a weak and annoying little blurb that had no purpose being in the film other than to annoy everyone watching it and to please the greedy money men at the top of the film food chain.

Nicholas Cage is no stranger to dealing with the Devil. Early 2011 saw the release of Drive Angry, in which Cage played Milton, a vengeful spirit who escapes hell to exact revenge upon his mortal foes. In comparison, Drive Angry is a good deal more entertaining. Drive Angry was far more aggressive in being ridiculous and crazed, and this is, at least in part, fueled by its R rating. Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance keeps things pretty tame, which is unfortunate considering its subject matter. You'd expect things might get pretty bloody with a flaming skull monster that whips evildoers into pieces with infernal chains, but this is kept bloodless and PG-13 friendly by having the chains burn their victims up in CGI flames.

Really, the biggest flaw of Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance is that it's too damned tame. A Ghost Rider film should have an edge but the monster played by Nicholas Cage is a blunted force. We're told repeatedly of how unrelenting and merciless Ghost Rider is — but we never really see it. Sure, he kills bad guys, but anyone can do that. He's actually not all that merciless about it. More lines should have been crossed, and they never really are. I'll put it this way: I doubt even Rick Santorum would be offended by this film, and Santorum is a fascist Christian asshole. If a movie featuring a flaming skull-headed motorcycle-riding monster created by Satan can't offend a man touting a Christian version of Sharia Law, then it has serious problems. Maybe if Meatloaf had been in it.

This is a Day Two Review.



Rating: (2.5 out of 5):

Share

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Offline
Joined: 01/28/2012
Posts: 2

I know this is a little late since the review is already up, but for those of you who read the review I'd like to ask you to please check out this story before you decide to go see this movie:

http://www.lordshaper.com/2012/02/13/boycotting-ghost-rider/

It's an article about how the writer who created the Ghost Rider character- a guy named Gary Friedrich- for Marvel comics back in 1972 wanted credit and his share of the profits based off his creation. So he sued Marvel Entertainment/Disney, but because of his contract and the ambiguity of creator ownership rights between artist/author and large publishing companies like Marvel and DC who commission freelancers, a judge ruled in favor of Marvel. They also granted the publishing giant the counter-suit claim they filed against Mr. Friedrich for money he made over the last couple of decades off of his character and artwork. So now he has to pay Marvel $17,000 for stealing his idea and is forbidden, among other things, from calling himself the creator of Ghost Rider.

It's not like I was really going to pay to go see this anyway, but now I wouldn't even if someone else was buying and I literally had nothing else to do. I'd rather stay home and clean the kitty litter box- I wouldn't feel as dirty afterwards.

What happened to my Marvel?? :Sp
It's like watching my childhood dream choke to death on it's own vomit...

0 votes
Cash Bailey's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/23/2010
Posts: 1734

Marvel seems to love not only denying creators their dues, but destroying them utterly, whenever possible.

0 votes
Thomwade's picture
Offline
Joined: 02/26/2010
Posts: 1295

Sorry...but we need to add some facts. Gary sued Marvel and the studio claiming to be the sole owner of Ghost Rider. He also claimed to be the sole creator. The first part-that he owned the character is fundamentally untrue. Marvel holds the copyright. The second part is disputed by other creators who were there.

In addition, Gary was selling bootleg merchandise of OTHER artists' work...prints, t-shirts, etc. that is where the $17,000 comes from. I cannot respect Gary's actions. He was not compensating the artists whose drawings he was using on the merchandise. Marvel actually treats artists better now than they did in the days of Kirby. Marvel will work out deals with creators allowing them to sell prints of their work featuring characters Marvel owns at cons to help make extra money.

While I think the $17,000 is unduly harsh, and I support the people raising money for Friedrich, this is not as simple as giant corporation vs little creator. I would be pissed to find people making money off my work without even consulting me as Friedrich did.

(I know we love to always see the corporations as the evil bad guys...but in a lot of was, Friedrich is guilty of doing to artists -and not, Gary is a writer, he was not selling his art-is the same thing some claim Marvel is doing to him...screwing them over for profit.)

This is, best case, a case of poor ethical choices on Marvel's part and illegal artistic theft on the part of Gary Friedrich.

0 votes
Superheidi's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/30/2008
Posts: 14324

What I want to know is this: if a character in the film has a curse and EVERYTHING he touches shrivels and decays, then is he naked? Because shouldn't all his clothes fall off and decay? Shouldn't the steering wheel under his hands disintegrate into dust when he's driving?

It's like that idea of having an acid that could corrode anything, and eat through any kind of substance, but you walk in the door carrying it in a glass beaker and the beaker is fine.

__________________

I'm the owner and editor of PlanetFury. You can also find me at PlanetEtheria.com

0 votes
Theron's picture
Offline
Joined: 10/25/2006
Posts: 2336

Superheidi wrote:

What I want to know is this: if a character in the film has a curse and EVERYTHING he touches shrivels and decays, then is he naked? Because shouldn't all his clothes fall off and decay? Shouldn't the steering wheel under his hands disintegrate into dust when he's driving?

Shouldn't his dick fall off when he masturbates? C'mon, you know you all were thinking it.

__________________

A mind is like a parachute. It doesn't work if it's not open.

0 votes
Superheidi's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/30/2008
Posts: 14324

Theron wrote:

Shouldn't his dick fall off when he masturbates? C'mon, you know you all were thinking it.

I was totally thinking it.

__________________

I'm the owner and editor of PlanetFury. You can also find me at PlanetEtheria.com

0 votes
Chris McMillan's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/28/2009
Posts: 1324

Theron wrote:
Superheidi wrote:

What I want to know is this: if a character in the film has a curse and EVERYTHING he touches shrivels and decays, then is he naked? Because shouldn't all his clothes fall off and decay? Shouldn't the steering wheel under his hands disintegrate into dust when he's driving?

Shouldn't his dick fall off when he masturbates? C'mon, you know you all were thinking it.

Okay, the Ghost Rider pissing fire and a demon who rots off his own dick?

Oh man, THAT'S ENTERTAINMENT!

__________________

Visit my blog: http://shadowoverportland.blogspot.com/

0 votes
Tristan Sinns's picture
Offline
Joined: 11/26/2008
Posts: 3593

Chris McMillan wrote:

Okay, the Ghost Rider pissing fire and a demon who rots off his own dick?

Oh man, THAT'S ENTERTAINMENT!

Okay - Ghost Rider pissing fire actually *made* it into the film though. The other didn't.

I'm not sure if I should feel sad about this or not.

__________________

I made this website. I'm sorry.

0 votes
Private J.V. Vasquez's picture
Offline
Joined: 01/09/2005
Posts: 1847

Quote:

Okay - Ghost Rider pissing fire actually *made* it into the film though. The other didn't.

I'm not sure if I should feel sad about this or not.

Well I know it broke my friend's heart who was a absolutely huge fan of "Ghost Rider" and would endlessly talk about the history of him whenever we talked about comic books. This is what he said about the first movie that I quote "Pretty much destroyed everything that I ever loved about that comic book." He said this very serious and well I haven't really bothered to give it a try and well ok if they honestly put him pissing fire that's just well I have no words. It seemed so bad I passed, I did read a interesting thread on a message board about why the hell didn't they cast Wes Bentley instead of Nicolas Cage? Because well apparently they thought Wes Bentley was much more intense than Nic Cage lol so why the hell was he just playing the villain? You know I don't hate Nicholas Cage, the only movies I thought he was just amazing in were Leaving Las Vegas, Adaptation, Raising Arizona, and Kick Ass. I just think he probably thinks of himself as being so bad ass that he could be in a movie with a talking toilet seat and it could be Oscar gold. I mean that's how deluded he seems. I mean sometimes I just want to get the remake of "The Wicker Man" just to see how bad it is exactly?

__________________

"I hurt" - Karen Cooper "Night Of The Living Dead"

0 votes
Chris McMillan's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/28/2009
Posts: 1324

Tristan Sinns wrote:
Chris McMillan wrote:

Okay, the Ghost Rider pissing fire and a demon who rots off his own dick?

Oh man, THAT'S ENTERTAINMENT!

Okay - Ghost Rider pissing fire actually *made* it into the film though. The other didn't.

I'm not sure if I should feel sad about this or not.

Well, I guess I'll pass then. :bigsmile:

__________________

Visit my blog: http://shadowoverportland.blogspot.com/

0 votes

User login

Cosplay Costumes

Enter your email address:

Get Planet Fury news in your inbox!

  • Planet Fury Privacy Policy


Graphics created by ArtSkull
Pretty-Scary.net, FanGirlTastic, and Planet Fury © Copyright 2004-2012 Heidi Honeycutt
Site layout, design, and code awesomeness by Tristan Sinns