"I think, Sebastian, therefore I am. - Pris, Blade Runner"


Game of Thrones (2011)

Directed by: Tim Van Patten
Written by: David Benioff, D. B. Weiss, George R. R. Martin
Cast: Sean Bean, Mark Addy, Nikolaj Coster-Waldau, Michelle Fairley, Lena Headey, Emilia Clarke, Iain Glen, Aidan Gillen, Harry Lloyd, Kit Harington, Sophie Turner, Maisie Williams, Isaac Hempstead-Wright, Richard Madden, Jack Gleeson, Peter Dinklage

It's better than 97% of the shit on TV right now, that's for damned sure.

Unless, of course, you ask a middle-aged, unhappy, seriously-mainstream-circa-1987 writer for, say, oh, I don't know, The New York Times. In that case, you might get a different answer. Otherwise, Game of Thrones is nothing short of amazing.

"But that can't be true!" you exclaim! "There is no such thing as good TV anymore!"

Yes there is, I tell you. TV is good when it is really expensive. Like when they have an entire castle built in Scotland so that they can get an exterior shot of a castle. Like, "million dollars an episode expensive". That shit is good. Remember Battlestar Galactica? That good.

Game of Thrones is a fantasy story about warring kingdoms, and rulers, in a continent called Westeros. (Westeros, incidentally, is just north of Southoryos and west of Essos. Get it?). Westeros is inhabited by a medieval-Europe-type culture and has attained a medieval-Europe technological level. Inspired by the real-life War of the Roses in England and France in the 1300s, author George R.R. Martin has taken great pains to make his world as relatable to western history as humanly possible. The TV adaptation, likewise, takes great pains to copy the novels down to small and awesome details. Did I happen to mention they built castles, and shot in the snow?

Winterfell is a kingdom in the north of Westeros, which is held by the Stark family and has been held by Starks for thousands of years. Ned Stark, the patriarch of the family, receives a visit from King Robert from King's Landing, asking Ned to join him at his castle, called King's Landing, to serve as The King's Hand (think: Secretary of State) since his last three King's Hands all died really quickly in succession.

That's the plot of the first episode. If you feel like you're missing something, you are, and I shall fill you in. Ned's family consists of the red-headed Catelyn and their children; teenaged Rob, his 13-year-old half-brother Jon, 13-year-old Sansa (who looks just like her mother), 10-year-old Bran, 9-year-old Arya, and a 3-year-old kid (whose name I forget). Anyway, they live in Winterfell, a huge castle in the northern lands that gets snowy really early (think: Scottish Highlands weather, or Montana, if you're a yank) and winter is coming. Winter in this world can last for years, and so can summer. So it's really cool if it's summer, but once summer is over... well. You can see the problems. So, in this first episode, we meet the Starks, see their castle, learn how honorable Ned is, and how shallow Sansa is, how mischievous Arya is, how worried Catelyn is, how pissed off Jon is because he's illegitimate, and what a good climber Bran is.

We also meet King Robert, who runs everything, and his blond wife Queen Cersei. Cersei's twin brother Jamie is a member of the King's Guard, so he shows up everywhere Rob and Cersei are. Cersei and Rob have some royal blond children: Joffrey and Myrcella. We only meet Joffrey in this, kind of. He's a douche. Anyway, everyone gets together and has a feast.

But Game of Thrones, while a fantasy story, is actually an espionage-y thriller. There's a lot of political intrigue going on. People are plotting against each other, people are plotting to take over the one kingdom and put someone on the throne, to kill this King's Hand, etc. There's a LOT of political intrigue. Just in this first episode we find out that Jon Arryn, the King's Hand, was murdered because of something he knew. We also find out about Cersei and Jamie (if you read the books, you know) and we find out who isn't above child-killing to get their way.

Did I forget to mention that whole thing about Prince Viserys Targaryan, and his sister Daenerys, and how they live in Pentos, across the sea, because Ned Stark and King Rob and Jamie Lannister killed their father, Aerys Targaryan, the rightful ruler of Westeros, and Viserys is plotting to reclaim his throne with the aid of a Dothraki barbarian warlord, to whom he marries his sister? Yes? Hm.

What makes Game of Thrones so fucking good as a TV show (aside from the gobs and gobs of money spent on it) is the casting. It's brilliantly cast, and anyone who is a fan of the novels will have some really happy moments watching these actors look and sound like the characters. Cersei Lannister, played by Lena Headey in a long blond wig, is condescending and proud. Tyrion Lannister (Peter Dinklage) is probably a stroke of genius; he's the perfect embodiment of sarcasm and anger and wit. Jamie Lannister (Nikolaj Coster-Waldau), Ned Stark (Sean Bean), Viserys (Harry Lloyd), Khal Drogo (Jason Momoa) and Arya Stark (Maisie Williams) are perfect. Wouldn't change a thing. My only gripe with the casting is that Rob Stark (Richard Madden), Catelyn (Michelle Fairley), Jon Snow (Kit Harington), and Daenerys (Emilia Clarke) are all cast a bit older than they are in the novels. Rob Stark is 14 at the beginning of Game of Thrones the novel, but he, and his younger brother Jon, are sporting some serious 20-year-old facial hair in the TV series. Daenerys's 13-year-old boobs look awfully 22, and Catelyn, who got married at 18 and whose oldest son is 14, looks suspiciously 45 (yes, I nerded out and did the math). I'm not sure why these characters were aged; maybe it has something to do with how much rape and child nudity/molestation goes on in the novels? No, I'm not kidding.

I know when I see a TV version of a novel I adored, and I like the TV version, that other nerds like me will also be quite happy. Because I'm a bitchy nerd who doesn't like change. The dialogue was not dumbed-down for you losers who haven't read the novels, and it wasn't written poorly like that shit on The Tudors. It's smart. It's not insulting. It's... respectful of the source material. And it's fucking gorgeous-looking. Seriously, this cinematographer should be looking at some kind of cinematographer-Emmy come, you know, Emmy time, whenever that is. The sets, the costumes, the art direction, the attention to amazing and important detail are literally some of the best I've ever seen on television. How can that be? Are most people who make TV just seriously untalented hacks? Because the crew behind Game of Thrones makes them all seem like seriously untalented hacks (see: Two and a Half Men).

I can tell you that the story only gets better from this point on. The first episode covers about the first 4th of the first novel. There's so much more. People get so much meaner. People get so much more wicked.



Rating: (5 out of 5):

Share
Cash Bailey's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/23/2010
Posts: 1734

Good to hear.

I'm really looking forward to checking this out. I'm sure we all have our dream book series we'd love to see done with this level of production value and faithfulness. I'd kill to see Joe Abercrombie's 'The First Law' trilogy done, or even the standalone novel in that world 'Best Served Cold'.

I think George R.R. Martin fans should consider themselves extremely fortunate to have this series made and that it wasn't just thrown together by a bunch of hacks.

0 votes
Tristan Sinns's picture
Offline
Joined: 11/26/2008
Posts: 3593

I thought this was absolutely perfect. I can't really think how they could have made it better.

Man I hope this show continues to be popular - I know it's expensive to make!

__________________

I made this website. I'm sorry.

0 votes
Offline
Joined: 08/14/2010
Posts: 1825

Another Rome?

__________________

This is not a dream... not a dream. We are using your brain's electrical system as a receiver. We are unable to transmit through conscious neural interference. You are receiving this broadcast as a dream. We are transmitting from the year one, nine, nine, nine. You are receiving this broadcast in order to alter the events you are seeing. Our technology has not developed a transmitter strong enough to reach your conscious state of awareness, but this is not a dream. You are seeing what is actually occurring for the purpose of causality violation.

0 votes
Tristan Sinns's picture
Offline
Joined: 11/26/2008
Posts: 3593

Hans wrote:

Another Rome?

As far as cancellation - I sure hope not. That said, it looks to be a better series than Rome. This first episode really ramped up my faith.

__________________

I made this website. I'm sorry.

0 votes
Jenna M. Pitman's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/19/2011
Posts: 150

Personally, my disappointments included the lack of trees around Winterfell (I always pictured it more like the Cascades and the leeward side of the Rockies than Montana, mainly because fir trees and a dense wolfs wood were described), the fact that the wolves were still so young at the end of the episode (how are they supposed to be formidable in a few weeks?!), and that the loving sex between Ned and Cat and the super gentle sex between the Kahl and Dany were cut out/rewritten. They would rather show us bawdy scenes and have the Kahl wrenching her arms away instead of tenderly telling her "no" and convincing her that sex with him will be fun (which sets up the fact that he's not the monster she was afraid he would be, at least not to her, so she was eager to be a part of his world and culture)

0 votes
Jenna M. Pitman's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/19/2011
Posts: 150

Quote:

My only gripe with the casting is that Rob Stark (Richard Madden), Catelyn (Michelle Fairley), Jon Snow (Kit Harington), and Daenerys (Emilia Clarke) are all cast a bit older than they are in the novels. Rob Stark is 14 at the beginning of Game of Thrones the novel, but he, and his younger brother Jon, are sporting some serious 20-year-old facial hair in the TV series. Daenerys's 13-year-old boobs look awfully 22, and Catelyn, who got married at 18 and whose oldest son is 14, looks suspiciously 45 (yes, I nerded out and did the math).

They have made the series take place 17 years after the war, not 14 (my guess is so that people who were watching a 14 year old girl get felt up weren't going to freak out) So that makes Rob, Jon, and Dany all 17 going on 18. It makes Sansa 13/14 instead of 11, it makes Joffery 15/16, Arya 11 and so on. My guess is that this was about the sex though Martin has said that he felt that Arya and Bran were too young and regretted writing them that way.

0 votes
Tristan Sinns's picture
Offline
Joined: 11/26/2008
Posts: 3593

Jenna M. Pitman wrote:

They would rather show us bawdy scenes and have the Kahl wrenching her arms away instead of tenderly telling her "no" and convincing her that sex with him will be fun (which sets up the fact that he's not the monster she was afraid he would be, at least not to her, so she was eager to be a part of his world and culture)

I caught this too.

The first time they have sex, he's rather gently telling her "no", and even asking it as a question, if I recall - "no?". Eventually, through some banter, she puts *his* hand on her body, and says "Yes.". It's exactly as you described - it showed that the Kahl may not be the ogre she was afraid he was, and that there may even be something growing between them.

I thought the show was excellent, but I agree I wish this scene had the same nuances as the book.

__________________

I made this website. I'm sorry.

0 votes
Superheidi's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/30/2008
Posts: 14324

Jenna M. Pitman wrote:

Personally, my disappointments included the lack of trees around Winterfell (I always pictured it more like the Cascades and the leeward side of the Rockies than Montana, mainly because fir trees and a dense wolfs wood were described), the fact that the wolves were still so young at the end of the episode (how are they supposed to be formidable in a few weeks?!), and that the loving sex between Ned and Cat and the super gentle sex between the Kahl and Dany were cut out/rewritten. They would rather show us bawdy scenes and have the Kahl wrenching her arms away instead of tenderly telling her "no" and convincing her that sex with him will be fun (which sets up the fact that he's not the monster she was afraid he would be, at least not to her, so she was eager to be a part of his world and culture)

Jenna, totally right. There were not enough trees around Winterfell. I believe they shoot Winterfell in the scottish highlands which are, as named, too 'high' to have tons of trees. The woods was basically one giant tree near a pond. I'm curious why they made that choice.

Also, I didn't catch that it was 17, not 14, years. Good catch. That definitely explains why Jon and Rob look old enough for me to have sex with them.

I do in my heart believe that I am not the only person who feels that Martin's clear enjoyment of the medieval tradition of 12 year old girls having sex is.. ah... pervy. I'm sure they oldened up these characters so that sex would seem more natural for them and as not to offend people who may not have read the novels.

Also, I am sad that Cat and Ned didn't get their nice sex, and that they totally skewed the way the sex happens between Khal Drogo and Dany. It WAS a nicer sex scene in the book, a beginning of the their bond. He didn't essentially rape her. I'm not sure why they made that choice.

I am glad we got that sex scene between the twins, however. If they hadn't shown that, I'd have been pissed.

__________________

I'm the owner and editor of PlanetFury. You can also find me at PlanetEtheria.com

4 votes
Jenna M. Pitman's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/19/2011
Posts: 150

Quote:

I am glad we got that sex scene between the twins, however. If they hadn't shown that, I'd have been pissed.

I found it interesting that we didn't see a naked Cersei. Made me wonder if there were "no nudity" contracts with some of their more major actors. (Though in the case of Cat and Ned, even if there were I'm STILL going to blame it on the fact that the media doesn't like to show middle aged people actually enjoying sex unless it's to laugh at)

I only found out the bit about them making it three years later by reading a review from some place else before the show came out and doing research after that. I'm not sure how I feel about that since it changes things - when you remember that they were younger than the age of majority - but it does make the eye candy a lot less creepy!

0 votes
Superheidi's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/30/2008
Posts: 14324

Jenna M. Pitman wrote:

I found it interesting that we didn't see a naked Cersei. Made me wonder if there were "no nudity" contracts with some of their more major actors. (Though in the case of Cat and Ned, even if there were I'm STILL going to blame it on the fact that the media doesn't like to show middle aged people actually enjoying sex unless it's to laugh at)

I get a feeling that Headey has no interest in doing nudity. I wouldn't be surprised if she has a clause in her contract.

Which makes me wonder how they plan on handling all the OTHER sex scenes she has in the stories...

__________________

I'm the owner and editor of PlanetFury. You can also find me at PlanetEtheria.com

0 votes
Jenna M. Pitman's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/19/2011
Posts: 150

Quote:

Which makes me wonder how they plan on handling all the OTHER sex scenes she has in the stories...

My guess is a body doubles and nothing from the front.

0 votes
asharceneaux's picture
Offline
Joined: 10/21/2006
Posts: 1552

I don't have cable, so I'm going to have to catch this on Amazon digital or something. Anybody have the ebooks of the novels and willing to share? I can trade you some other ebooks...

Tristan Sinns's picture
Offline
Joined: 11/26/2008
Posts: 3593

asharceneaux wrote:

I don't have cable, so I'm going to have to catch this on Amazon digital or something. Anybody have the ebooks of the novels and willing to share? I can trade you some other ebooks...

I don't - though it was pointed out to me the other day that Amazon has a pretty good deal. The first four books are on sale for 20 bucks as a set:

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345529057/ref=pd_lpo_k2_dp_sr_1?pf_rd_...

I *think* that's all that's been released so far. I believe the fifth book is due out later this year. (Or maybe there's already a fifth book, and it's the sixth book that's due out later this year (either way, it's the last book of the series that's due out later this year (I love parenthesis!))).

__________________

I made this website. I'm sorry.

0 votes
Jenna M. Pitman's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/19/2011
Posts: 150

The fifth book, A Dance With Dragons is coming out in July. It isn't the last though.

Originally A Song of Ice and Fire was billed as a trilogy then Martin realized he was telling a huge story and got five books out of the deal. He was planning on skipping five years after A Storm of Swords and ending the book in one or two more. The problem was that he kept having to fill the reader in with back story of everything that had happened in those five years. Realizing that he would have to tell THAT he decided that rather than flash backs and whatnot he would just TELL us in two more books.

So after A Dance with Dragons we get The Winds of Winter and A Song of Spring.

(PS:
I am a MASSIVE Martin fan-girl. Like, I own books and collections from his work in the 70s and 80s. I apologize for my geekiness)

0 votes
Tristan Sinns's picture
Offline
Joined: 11/26/2008
Posts: 3593

Jenna M. Pitman wrote:

(PS:
I am a MASSIVE Martin fan-girl. Like, I own books and collections from his work in the 70s and 80s. I apologize for my geekiness)

Geekiness is very encouraged here! You're at the right place. Grin

__________________

I made this website. I'm sorry.

5 votes
Cash Bailey's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/23/2010
Posts: 1734

I finally got around to watching this and I really enjoyed it. Even as a loser who hasn't read the books I found I could keep up with the dense plot strands that were set up.

None of the characters have really grabbed me yet (gotta give it a few episodes for that) but I see myself enjoying Peter Dinklage, and that scrappy little girl was fun.

Overall, I thought it was a strong start. I'll definitely be downl... I mean watching every episode. Unless the show completely shits the bed, that is.

2 votes
Theron's picture
Offline
Joined: 10/25/2006
Posts: 2336

Cash Bailey wrote:

I finally got around to watching this and I really enjoyed it...None of the characters have really grabbed me yet (gotta give it a few episodes for that) but I see myself enjoying Peter Dinklage, and that scrappy little girl was fun.

Gotta love the Dink!

__________________

A mind is like a parachute. It doesn't work if it's not open.

0 votes
Theron's picture
Offline
Joined: 10/25/2006
Posts: 2336

Which has more nudity: True Blood or Game of Thrones ?

__________________

A mind is like a parachute. It doesn't work if it's not open.

5 votes
Superheidi's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/30/2008
Posts: 14324

Theron wrote:

Which has more nudity: True Blood or Game of Thrones ?

Damn i09. We'll show them soon.

__________________

I'm the owner and editor of PlanetFury. You can also find me at PlanetEtheria.com

1 vote
Tristan Sinns's picture
Offline
Joined: 11/26/2008
Posts: 3593

Episode two people!

I dug it a lot - my only continuing gripe (and it isn't a huge one) is the relationship building of Khal and Dany. I really wished they'd kept it more like the book. He was the mirror opposite of her brother, in that he was uncivilized, yet gentle and caring for Dany; while her brother was 'civilized' and completely cruel and masochistic towards her.

In the series they make it as if she teaches the Khal to be gentle; he didn't need any such teaching in the book.

__________________

I made this website. I'm sorry.

0 votes
Cash Bailey's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/23/2010
Posts: 1734

Yeah, another terrific episode.

With all its child-killing and cute doggies this may be the most shamelessly manipulative TV series ever made. Wink

0 votes
Cash Bailey's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/23/2010
Posts: 1734

Hey, nerds! Check it out. A 20-minute interview with G.R.R. Martin done for UK TV, conducted by the rising star of edgy, bad-ass fantasy, Joe Abercrombie.

I mentioned Abercrombie's awesome BEST SERVED COLD here and it's cool to see him interview one of his heroes.

Part 1:

Part 2:

0 votes
Jenna M. Pitman's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/19/2011
Posts: 150

Quote:

I dug it a lot - my only continuing gripe (and it isn't a huge one) is the relationship building of Khal and Dany. I really wished they'd kept it more like the book. He was the mirror opposite of her brother, in that he was uncivilized, yet gentle and caring for Dany; while her brother was 'civilized' and completely cruel and masochistic towards her.

In the series they make it as if she teaches the Khal to be gentle; he didn't need any such teaching in the book.

THIS!!!!! I am still several hours away from the 4th episode but this is a huge sticking point with me. I hate how they chose to execute this on screen. So so so so sad. Another blow to nuanced characters, now they are slightly less so. :/

0 votes
Superheidi's picture
Offline
Joined: 12/30/2008
Posts: 14324

Quote:

THIS!!!!! I am still several hours away from the 4th episode but this is a huge sticking point with me. I hate how they chose to execute this on screen. So so so so sad. Another blow to nuanced characters, now they are slightly less so. :/

I am going to miss tonight's episode! I will have to see it two weeks from now! eeek!

I want to see Viserys's head melt off in a pot of molten gold.

I also want to see the dungeons of The Eyrie.

__________________

I'm the owner and editor of PlanetFury. You can also find me at PlanetEtheria.com

0 votes
Theron's picture
Offline
Joined: 10/25/2006
Posts: 2336

I still haven't seen this show, but my friend's mom said, "That Game of Thrones show is just a bunch of back stabbing and front raping!" So, I am definitely going to watch it now...

__________________

A mind is like a parachute. It doesn't work if it's not open.

3 votes
Jenna M. Pitman's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/19/2011
Posts: 150

Viserys and the Eyrie will be next week. But this was probably their strongest episode, even better than the first.

0 votes
Tristan Sinns's picture
Offline
Joined: 11/26/2008
Posts: 3593

There was a lot of exposition in this one; tons of conversations that are obviously there just to give the viewers some of the complicated history. It did really pick up at the end.

I can't help but nitpick another deviation from the book; in the episode, they had Littlefinger of all people tell Sansa the story of Sandor Clegane and how his face came to be so burned. In the book, it was Clegane himself who told her; if I remember right, he'd been drinking, and was for a moment overcome with bitterness at his brother and burst out with the story.

I think they should have stuck with that; it gave Sandor a bit of depth and made him a tiny bit sympathetic.

__________________

I made this website. I'm sorry.

0 votes
Jenna M. Pitman's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/19/2011
Posts: 150

TRISTAN GET OUT OF MY HEAD!!!!

Seriously! I have talked with a lot of people about this today and while I have said "there was A LOT of exposition!" they all rolled their eyes at me. I thought this episode was the strongest, I really do, but the exposition! It seemed so amateurish. I was bummed that I was the only person who noticed.

And I thought the same thing about the Littlefinger bit. For two reasons. It's part of how we see that Sansa might mean something to the Hound (his relationship with Sansa humanizes him AND it strengthens her) And because it is a lot more creepy when Littlefinger tells Sansa about how she looks like her mom and how much she loved him and she could have been HIS daughter. (if it weren't for those meddling Starks!)

I was also upset with how they presented Sam. They were doing fine until the scene where he and Jon were cleaning tables. Then suddenly they have him talking about girls like he is the nerdy best friend in a Van Wilder-esque flick. What the hell?! I don't care about changing things but the way I see it, that makes him unlikable. We're already looking down on him for being a coward and fat, now we're going to look down on him for being all about teh sexz? I get that the scene was a set up for showing us how Jon "will never father a bastard" but it was a really bad way to deliver it. :/ It shouldn't have been at the expense of our liking Sam.

(Also, the last scene where Dany is talking to Mormont? Who thought it would be a good idea to have them standing like that? They looked like they were dolls or something!")

0 votes
Tristan Sinns's picture
Offline
Joined: 11/26/2008
Posts: 3593

Jenna M. Pitman wrote:

TRISTAN GET OUT OF MY HEAD!!!!

Hah! Grin

Jenna M. Pitman wrote:

I was also upset with how they presented Sam. They were doing fine until the scene where he and Jon were cleaning tables. Then suddenly they have him talking about girls like he is the nerdy best friend in a Van Wilder-esque flick. What the hell?!

Totally. Couldn't agree more. It just weirded up the whole dynamic of the two. I think they were trying to demonstrate Jon's feelings about being a 'bastard'; but really, they just didn't need to have done that. The entire scene should have been cut - then maybe they could have given us five more minutes of the tournament!

I've actually grown more annoyed at having Littlefinger tell the Hound's story instead of the Hound himself; it was just so incongruent and off. Why would Littlefinger choose that moment of all moments to suddenly blurt out the Hound's story to Sansa? It just didn't make sense and it screws up any dynamic between Sansa and the Hound.

Besides these grumbles - I love the show. I've heard episodes five and six are supposed to be particularly great.

__________________

I made this website. I'm sorry.

0 votes
Jenna M. Pitman's picture
Offline
Joined: 04/19/2011
Posts: 150

Quote:

then maybe they could have given us five more minutes of the tournament!

That was what I said! About that and a few of the other scenes of exposition.

3 votes

User login

Cosplay Costumes

Enter your email address:

Get Planet Fury news in your inbox!

  • Planet Fury Privacy Policy


Graphics created by ArtSkull
Pretty-Scary.net, FanGirlTastic, and Planet Fury © Copyright 2004-2012 Heidi Honeycutt
Site layout, design, and code awesomeness by Tristan Sinns